Study Says Airport Body Scans Pose Little Risk to Your Health

Posted by: admin  :  Category: Alternatives

84e91 airport 300x227 Study Says Airport Body Scans Pose Little Risk to Your HealthAccording to a recently released study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine this week, there is little to no health risk in using the full body scanners at the airports.

The article was based on a study that was geared towards determining what the risk may be from the backscatter X-ray type of scanners now in use at some airports in the security lanes. Over the past year or so, the Transportation Security Administration installed about 500 of the full-body scanners in U.S. airports and expects to put in another 500 by the end of 2011.

According to one of the article authors, Professor of Radiology Rebecca Smith-Bindman, University of California, San Francisco, a person going through one of the scanners gets about as much radiation as what they would get in either an X-ray or a CT scan. For example, when a woman gets a mammogram, they are exposed to what would be the same as over 4,000 airport scans, and if they got a CT scan, it would be the same as getting 200,000 airport scans. This shows that going through an airport scanner isn’t as potentially dangerous as some well known medical procedures.

Birdman added that air travelers got much more radiation from flying itself, and that walking through a full-body scanner was like being on a flight for a few minutes. Plus, she added that all of us are exposed daily to radiation from the sun and the Earth.

The study was done because of the concern of some doctors on whether or not the scanners are safe. The concern was that x-ray radiation can damage DNA, which would then increase a person’s cancer risk. When this was tested with the airport scanners, it was estimated that if 100 million people flew 750 million times a year, only an estimated six additional cancer cases would develop due to radiation from an airport scanner.

With all of these tests and comparisons, the bottom line was that the researchers say there is no noteworthy radiation threat from walking through an airport scanner.

Related Posts :

Just How Bad Is The KFC Double For Your Health?

Posted by: admin  :  Category: Uncategorized

2bfe9 DoubleDown Just How Bad Is The KFC Double For Your Health?
As we foreshadowed in our Takeaway Food Week instalment on chicken, KFC is releasing the Double — a burger with two pieces of chicken, bacon and cheese plus sauce but no actual bun — in Australia. Does dumping the bread make it healthier or less healthy?

Picture by djjewelz

As we noted in our post on burgers, having an occasional burger for a meal in and of itself isn’t necessarily a nutritional disaster. The single most sensible thing you can do is ditch the fries and full-strength cola that comes in a combo deal, since that’s what generally pushes the total kilojoule count over what you need from a single meal.

KFC’s marketing for the Double (the name has shrunk from its US moniker of the Double Down) emphasises that point, pushing the Double as an “occasional” treat while stressing its alleged “manly” qualities. When I contacted KFC’s internal PR to double-check the nutritional information, KFC reminded me that “The Double Original has less fat and kilojoules than a Big Mac, less fat than a Quarter Pounder, and almost half the fat of a Whopper”.

That is true, but it’s a somewhat qualified statement and the reality is a little more complex than that. Let’s put the Double into nutritional perspective by comparing it to those burgers and a few other similar chicken options on KFC’s own menu and those of its rivals:

The single most important thing you can note here is that the Zinger version is substantially fattier, and hence higher in kilojoules, than the standard version of the Double. Indeed, it’s just about the worst choice kilojoule and sodium-wise on the entire list, save for the Whopper and the Spicy Cheesy Bacon Tendercrisp from Hungry Jack’s.

The difference between the Double and its rivals isn’t massive. While the Original Double does have less fat and kilojoules than a Big Mac, the difference isn’t massive, and there’s a lot more sodium in the Original Double. And there’s not much difference between getting a Double and getting a Bacon Cheese Burger from KFC, other than the obvious one of getting less protein with the latter.

The final point should be obvious, but I’ll note it anyway: adding cheese and bacon bloats your burger. Every one of these chains offers a grilled chicken burger that doesn’t include those options, and which is much friendlier on your waistline as a result. In that category, the Classic Seared Chicken Burger from McDonald’s is the lowest-kilojoule choice.

If you still can’t resist the thought of the Double after all that information, it’s already on sale in Queensland, and goes on sale across the rest of the country on Wednesday March 30. Right now it’s said to be a four-week deal (though Tasmania gets it for six weeks). However, the US release was extended due to popular demand, so there’s no telling what might happen here, bacon freaks.

KFC Double Nutritional Information [PDF link]

A drink to your health can be taken to heart

Posted by: admin  :  Category: Uncategorized

As appealing as a regular glass of wine with dinner may sound, the question of whether that habit is good or bad for your health has raged for decades. The belief that alcohol is good for your heart seems to conflict with a recent World Health Organization warning that harmful alcohol use is a major global killer.

This edition of HealthWatch raises a glass and seeks to clarify the debate.

How serious a problem is alcohol abuse?

The WHO estimates there are 140 million alcoholics worldwide. In fact, alcohol abuse exacts a toll on world health that is on a par with unsafe sex, measles and malaria, and potentially even greater than tobacco.

Alcohol and cardiovascular risks:

A number of studies have suggested that moderate alcohol intake reduces cardiovascular risk when comparing countries with different consumption profiles. While alcohol may have this effect, it is important to point out that this effect is not uniform in men and women or across age groups. Some research has demonstrated that in men, cardio protection occurs only in those middle-aged and older. And the risk of hypertension is actually increased in older men who drink heavily.

How does alcohol reduce cardiovascular risk?

The positive effect of alcohol on the heart can be explained by a couple of mechanisms. For example, alcohol increases HDL (the good cholesterol) and decreases LDL (the bad cholesterol). In addition, alcohol decreases thrombosis, or blood clotting, and increases fibrinolysis, the process by which clots dissolve.

What are the downsides?

As one researcher put it, the substitution of one disease for another is not a medical advance, particularly since other strategies for the prevention of heart disease, such as exercise and blood pressure control, do not carry the undesirable effects of excess alcohol consumption.

The overriding concern is that recommending moderate alcohol consumption may lead to over-consumption, particularly among youth. The risks of alcohol abuse are diverse and extremely serious. In addition to cardiovascular disease they include fetal damage, liver disease and certain types of cancer, as well as injury and violence, the latter particularly among young people.

The study

Ronksley PE, Brien SE, Turner BJ et al. Association of alcohol consumption with selected cardiovascular disease outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2011 Feb 22;342: d671. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d671.

What kind of study was this?

There have been dozens of studies following specific groups of subjects that have examined the connection between alcohol intake and the risk of developing or even dying from such cardiovascular diseases as heart attack or stroke. Some of these, however, have been more reliable than others. Some studies may have used a longer followup period, which gives a more accurate picture of the interaction between alcohol and illness.

Another issue is that other factors, such as exercise, that may have had an effect on heart attack and stroke, and may have been more commonly seen in moderate drinkers, were better accounted for and better neutralized in some studies than in others.

These researchers combed through all of the potentially relevant studies that looked at these questions, teasing out all the high-quality ones and weighing them in such a way that the larger ones carried proportionately more weight. They then used standard techniques to add up the conclusions of all of the studies that met the bar into one overall estimate of the impact on health.

What are the findings?

The authors used 84 studies to reach their findings and showed that alcohol reduced the overall risk of death from cardiovascular causes by 15 to 25 per cent. If you break these down, you find that most of the benefit is derived from fewer heart attacks and less death from heart disease, with an actual increase in stroke risk at higher levels of consumption. In fact, the tipping point seems to lie at one to two drinks per day, beyond which the increased risk of stroke, presumably related to higher blood pressure, seems significant.

Are there any caveats?

Yes. It’s worth remembering that none of these 84 studies were experiments or randomized trials that can draw a closer connection between cause and effect. Nonetheless, this is the best evidence we have at the moment, and patterns noted between the amount of alcohol consumed and health benefits are convincing.

Another important point is that because most of the patients in these studies were age 40 or older, we cannot be sure of the impact of that kind of long-term alcohol intake for those in their 20s who drink on a regular basis.

The material provided in HealthWatch is designed for general educational purposes only and does not pertain to individual cases. It should not replace necessary medical consultations with your own doctor or medical professional.

How Your Schedule Can Help (or Hurt) Your Health

Posted by: admin  :  Category: Uncategorized

Disruptions to our circadian rhythm, the 24-hour clock that drives sleeping and wakefulness, affect our bodies in more ways than previously believed.

New research shows that each of our organs contains cells with their own circadian-clock genes that help bodily processes, such as digestion, operate with maximum efficiency at certain times of day.

When a person’s circadian clock is thrown off—by jet lag or shift work or eating at the wrong time—it can, over time, contribute to weight gain and depression. It may even increase the likelihood of heart and liver problems.

“If you disturb that 24-hour organization, you’re going to have a disruption of function within the tissue,” says Fred Turek, a biology sciences professor and director of Northwestern University’s Center for Sleep and Circadian Biology, in Evanston, Ill.

10%: of the genes in our body tissue operate on a 24-hour rhythm, according to scientists.

The brain used to be thought of as the body’s master clock, sending signals telling organs when to operate. But over the past decade or so, as scientists discovered clock genes in cells in different organs in the body, the brain has come to be seen as the conductor of an orchestra. Each organ operates on its own internal clock, producing enzymes and molecules at different levels depending on the time of day; the brain works to make sure all the clocks are synchronized. Dyssynchrony between the brain and the rest of the organs, or between individual organs, can lead to problems. For example, if the pancreas is out of sync with the liver, insulin production may be too low or too high, Dr. Turek says.

The ubiquity of clock genes in the body has led to a burgeoning field of research focused on how disruptions in circadian rhythm may contribute to disease, and whether normalizing circadian rhythm within cells could help prevent or treat conditions including colitis, diabetes and obesity. Some researchers are conducting trials to see whether there is an optimal time of day to eat in order to gain less weight.

The clock genes appear to have a particularly strong influence on metabolism and how the body handles fat and sugar. For much of the past decade, Dr. Turek and his colleagues have been studying the way these genes interact with fat and how they contribute to obesity, diabetes and digestive conditions like colitis.

Like Clockwork

Click below to see a typical circadian-clock cycle based on an average sleep time:

View Full Image

577dc PJ BA095A LABci D 20110328201202 How Your Schedule Can Help (or Hurt) Your Health
577dc BTN insetClose How Your Schedule Can Help (or Hurt) Your Health5e8a6 PJ BA095A LABci G 20110328201202 How Your Schedule Can Help (or Hurt) Your Health

In 2005, they demonstrated that mice with a mutation to a clock gene in the brain’s “suprachiasmatic nucleus”—the region thought responsible for synchronizing circadian rhythm across the body—had a disrupted feeding pattern.

The mice ate more at all hours of the day, rather than primarily in the evening, when they are typically awake. These mutant mice were obese and had a number of metabolic problems, including high cholesterol and high blood sugar. The findings were published in the journal Science.

Then the researchers found something startling: It wasn’t just that the mice’s clock-gene mutation changed their behavior, but also that their behavior influenced the clock genes.

Eating a high-fat diet appeared to change the circadian-clock genes in a part of the brain, the liver and in fat tissue. In a later study, the group showed that nocturnal mice fed a high-fat diet only during the daytime, when they are supposed to be sleeping, gained more weight than mice fed during the dark phase, even when they ingested the same number of calories.

It isn’t clear exactly how disruptions in circadian rhythm could influence body weight. One theory is that at certain times of day, intestinal bacteria may be more or less active at breaking down food into molecules to be absorbed by the intestine. Eating fat at a time when the bacteria are less active could lead to poorer food breakdown and more fat stored, Dr. Turek says.

Dr. Turek’s team is also studying the intestinal condition known as colitis. Symptoms, including bouts of intense diarrhea, come and go in cycles—an observation that led Dr. Turek and his colleague, Ali Keshavarzian of Rush University Medical Center, to ask if circadian rhythm might play a role.

In a study published in 2008, they gradually shifted the sleep-wake cycle of healthy mice every five days for three months and showed that the animals had no changes in weight or intestinal distress. But when given a solution that induced colitis symptoms, mice whose sleep cycle had been shifted fared far worse, losing 25% of their body weight; mice on a normal circadian routine lost only about 10% of body weight.

In a separate study published in 2009 in Sleep Medicine, Dr. Turek’s team found that mice whose sleep was deprived had worse inflammation and slower recovery compared to mice in a control group.

“If you have your circadian clock disrupted, it may not be a problem,” Dr. Turek says. “But it may be a problem if you’re pregnant, or if you’re eating much more at the wrong time of day, or if you’re getting the flu.”

Other researchers have looked at the effect of clock genes on the liver. Steve Kay, dean of the biological-sciences division at the University of California, San Diego, and his colleagues showed that a particular clock gene shuts down excess glucose production in the liver.

A team from the University of Pennsylvania, led by medicine and genetics professor Mitch Lazar, recently found a clock-gene mechanism that reduces the production of fat in the liver at certain times of the day. Such findings suggest manipulating these clock genes could have implications for diabetes or fatty liver disease.

Other researchers, like Martin Young at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, are studying clock genes in the heart and have found evidence that circadian rhythm appears related to lipid production, like triglycerides, which could stress the heart and contribute to cardiac disease.

The easiest of the body’s circadian clocks to reset is that of the brain, Northwestern’s Dr. Turek says. Getting enough sleep—seven to eight hours—and ideally sleeping and waking at about the same time each day, even on weekends, is important to keep the sleep-wake cycle in tune.

It doesn’t appear that the seven to eight hours need be continuous at night, but consistently more sleep is better than less, says Dr. Turek. Eating and exercising regularly, but not close to bedtime, also are important to the sleep-wake cycle, he says.

In a case where the rhythm of a particular organ is out of sync with other organs, realignment is more difficult. It may not possible for an individual to control by changing their behaviors, but opens up the possibility of novel ways of treating disease.

“Now, perhaps in some patients, the reason they’re developing disease and other disorders is a biological clock that’s not functioning,” says UC San Diego’s Dr. Kay. “Now we have a number of new avenues for developing treatments.”

Write to Shirley S. Wang at shirley.wang@wsj.com

Don’t let work erode your health

Posted by: admin  :  Category: Uncategorized

Last Updated: Mar 28, 2011

The modern office might feature increasingly sophisticated technology, but that doesn’t necessarily make for a healthy working environment.

A recent study from the UK Chartered Society of Physiotherapists (CSP) reported a rise in the number of office workers being treated for muscular skeletal disorders (MSD). Spine and disc problems, carpal tunnel (wrist muscle) syndrome, and neck and shoulder strain are on the increase – with 46 per cent of employees claiming to experience pain resulting directly from their jobs – despite campaigns for a more ergonomic approach to work.

“The underlying cause seems to be the long-hours culture and the fact that even when we’re out of the office we don’t stop working,” suggests Sammy Margo, a therapist with the CSP. The issue may be particularly acute among those working in the Emirates, where long hours coupled with stifling outdoor summer temperatures prevent staff taking the rest breaks the experts recommend. One study put the number of workers in the Middle East suffering with repetitive strain injuries (RSI) as high as 68 per cent – while a 2010 survey by YouGov Siraj revealed that 65 per cent of stressed-out UAE residents cited increased workloads as the cause of their ill-health.

And while many workers may have been encouraged to step away from their desk at least, the alternative methods of working come with their own unique risks too. “It’s not just desktop PCs and laptops but also Blackberry devices, palm computers and iPhones that require extensive use of small muscles of the hand, which will fatigue more quickly,” warns Pauline Cole, an executive therapist with the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Occupational Health and Ergonomics.





 Dont let work erode your health

As a society, our compulsion to text, share, poke and tweet could also have long-term health implications. “Most people are aware of the dangers of sitting at a PC all day, but awareness when it comes to texting using small keyboards is sorely lacking,” says Ewa Gustafsson, an ergonomist at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. “Heavy texters should use both thumbs to avoid pain in the hand, arm or neck – also sit upright, with support for both back and forearms, while texting, and vary your posture.”

Even when we use our mobile communication gadgets for their primary function, to talk as we walk, we’re putting our health at risk. Dr Paul Hodges, a specialist in spine disorders at Queensland University, Australia, has found that talking on a mobile phone while walking upsets the body’s natural shock-absorption system. “Breathing affects the way the spine is supported by trunk muscles – but, talking at the same time as you’re walking can force your breathing out of synch, causing jolts to register on the spine,” warns Hodges.

Sammy Margo suggests that the solution to stopping technology from crippling us is to work smarter. “With so many of us teleworking these days, the emphasis should be on examining how we can work on the move without incurring problems,” says Margo. “I’ve been treating a client with tendon strain caused by overuse of the e-mail and text-messaging options on their Blackberry. He’s since changed his ways by using the technology more wisely. Now he just responds with one-word answers to e-mails and uses voice-recognition software to dictate instead of typing documents.”

Margo suggests that people adopt strategies when using devices such as iPads that will minimise the strain they put on their bodies – such as spending a block of time reading and then another block of time typing when they can sit correctly and use a desk or proper support.

“These gadgets are great,” he says. They’ve changed the way we live, but it’s happened so fast that we haven’t focused on how we use them and the knock-on effects they have on our physiology.”

Follow us on Twitter and keep up to date with the latest in arts and lifestyle news at twitter.com/LifeNationalUAE

Share this article:






Back to the top